Sorry, I don't think they've chosen the right actress. I feel she somehow looks like a transvestite.
Moreover, she performed well but not good enough because the ads without conversation requires skillful actress and actor in order to communicate correctly to the audience.
In the ads, she must be "in love", but I saw no love/shine in her eyes. She just "have fun" or "feel good" after having a boyfriend. The concept is "in love", not "fe l good".
The story is okey but the performance is not. The actress looks pretty and sexy in the ads, but cannot give us the refreshment feelings which is strongly required. Maybe, wrong casting. They might look at the fame of this actress without thinking whether she's really the right person.
As a result, I watched the ads and just saw a pretty lady (or transvestite) but not convinced to go out and buy the products. People may love this actress for more but won't buy the products. So, this ads may be used to promote the lady, not the products!!
In my humble opinion, C+ for this ads if they really want to sell their go ds.
1 ส.ค. 49 12:58
Ads ก็ ok. ดี แต่เนื้อหาก็ดูแปลกๆ pancake ก็น่ารักดี
Agree with Mr. YTN about casting and acting. Maybe, the lady was chosen under mutual benefit agreement between entertainment company and consumer industry. The entertainment firm is trying to sell this lady as a package as you can see her promotions around.
About the concept, are you trying to say the ads maker lost their way and made the ads look like being "in lust" instead of "in love"? As a result, the ads shows bad attitude (bad example) to Thai youth. I agree with your concern (just think of it after reading your comment).